Mazda cx 3 vs cr v

Mazda cx 3 vs cr v

When it comes to finding a dependable vehicle, both the Honda and the Mazda brands have probably come up during your search. So, naturally, if you are searching for an SUV, you might already have the 2019 Honda CR-V and the 2019 Mazda CX-3 on your radar. Solid, reliable, and spacious, both vehicles are good choices for your next SUV vehicle. But which one is the right fit for you? That is what we are here to find out.

Both of these vehicles have their own advantages, but we hope you’ll have a better understanding of these vehicles by the end of this comparison. It is important to note that we will be comparing the bottom trims for each vehicle. That means you’ll see the specs and features of the 2019 Honda CR-V LX FWD trim, which has a 2.4L 4cyl engine and a CVT transmission. It is pitted against the 2019 Mazda CX-3 Sport FWD, which has a 2.0L 4cyl engine with a 6-speed automatic transmission. Ready? Let’s begin.

View Our New CR-V Inventory

2019 Honda CR-V LX FWD vs 2019 Mazda CX-3 Sport FWD
$24,350 Starting MSRP* $20,390
185 hp & 180 lb.-ft. Horsepower/Torque 148 hp & 146 lb.-ft.
CVT Transmission 6-speed automatic
39.2 cu. ft. Cargo Space 12.4 cu. ft.
Standard Eco-Assist N/A
7.8 in. Ground Clearance 6.1 in.
1,500 lbs. Max Towing N/A

Technology and power of the 2019 Honda CR-V

As you can see in the table above, you’ll start off with a more expensive vehicle in the 2019 Honda CR-V. However, this is explained by the larger stature and towing capability. Meaning; if you are looking for an SUV that has about the same cargo space as a sedan, but offers more if you fold the seats down, you’ll probably be more interested in the 2019 Mazda CX-3 Sport. However, if you are looking for an SUV to drive not only in your day to day life, but also to take on vacations, then the 2019 Honda CR-V is more fitted than the Mazda CX-3. Sure, it’s a bit pricier, but in the end, the 2019 Honda CR-V is more versatile when it comes to power, space, and towing.

The 2019 Honda CR-V offers some great standard technology features, as well. From Bluetooth® connectivity and a USB audio interface for your music to a multi-angle rearview camera with guidelines, the Honda CR-V is ready to tackle your family vacation. While you are planning your trip, don’t forget about the optional roof rack of the Honda CR-V, which allows you to store even more gear or awkward objects such as bikes, kayaks, or other outdoor equipment.

If you have any further questions about your chosen Honda vehicle, please don’t hesitate to contact us here at Battison Honda. Our friendly team would love to share their knowledge with you!

*MSRP excluding tax, license, registration, $1045.00 destination charge and options. Dealer prices may vary

Safety

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

The CX-3 has standard Whiplash-Reducing Headrests, which use a specially designed headrest to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Whiplash-Reducing Headrests system moves the headrests forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The CR-V doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.

Both the CX-3 and the CR-V have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras and available all wheel drive.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda CX-3 is safer than the Honda CR-V:

CX-3

CR-V

Front Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Hip Force

334 lbs.

354 lbs.

Rear Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Hip Force

487 lbs.

609 lbs.

Into Pole

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

287

390

Spine Acceleration

31 G’s

43 G’s

Hip Force

629 lbs.

743 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

For its top level performance in IIHS driver and passenger-side small overlap frontal, moderate overlap frontal, side impact, roof strength and head restraint tests, its standard vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention system, its standard vehicle-to-pedestrian front crash prevention system, and its standard headlight’s “Acceptable” rating, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the CX-3 its highest rating: “Top Pick Plus” for 2021, a rating granted to only 35 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The CR-V is only a standard “Top Pick” for 2021.

Reliability

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

A reliable vehicle saves its owner time, money and trouble. Nobody wants to be stranded or have to be without a vehicle while it’s being repaired. Consumer Reports rates the CX-3’s reliability 38 points higher than the CR-V.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ December 2019 Auto Issue reports that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Honda vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Mazda second in reliability. Honda is ranked 12th.

Engine

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

As tested in Motor Trend the Mazda CX-3 is faster than the Honda CR-V:

CX-3

CR-V

Zero to 30 MPH

2.8 sec

3.1 sec

Zero to 60 MPH

8.4 sec

8.6 sec

Zero to 80 MPH

14.5 sec

14.7 sec

Quarter Mile

16.4 sec

16.7 sec

Fuel Economy and Range

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

On the EPA test cycle the CX-3 FWD gets better fuel mileage than the CR-V FWD CVT (29 city/34 hwy vs. 28 city/34 hwy).

Tires and Wheels

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

The CX-3’s tires provide better handling because they have a lower 60 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the CR-V LX’s standard 65 series tires.

Suspension and Handling

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

The CX-3 has engine speed sensitive variable-assist power steering, for low-effort parking, better control at highway speeds and during hard cornering, and a better feel of the road. The CR-V doesn’t offer variable-assist power steering.

The CX-3 AWD handles at .85 G’s, while the CR-V Touring AWD pulls only .79 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

The CX-3 AWD executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the CR-V Touring AWD (27.6 seconds @ .66 average G’s vs. 28.3 seconds @ .6 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the CX-3’s turning circle is 2.6 feet tighter than the CR-V’s (34.8 feet vs. 37.4 feet).

Chassis

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

The Mazda CX-3 may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 500 to 600 pounds less than the Honda CR-V.

The CX-3 is 1 foot, 1.8 inches shorter than the CR-V, making the CX-3 easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

As tested by Car and Driver while at idle, the interior of the CX-3 AWD is quieter than the CR-V Touring AWD (39 vs. 40 dB).

Passenger Space

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

The front step up height for the CX-3 is 3 inches lower than the CR-V (16” vs. 19”). The CX-3’s rear step up height is 2 inches lower than the CR-V’s (16” vs. 18”).

Ergonomics

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

The CX-3 has a standard heads-up display that projects speed and other key instrumentation readouts in front of the driver’s line of sight, allowing drivers to view information without diverting their eyes from the road. The CR-V doesn’t offer a heads-up display.

The CX-3’s rain-sensitive wipers adjust their speed and turn on and off automatically based on the amount of rainfall on the windshield. This allows the driver to concentrate on driving without constantly adjusting the wipers. The CR-V LX’s standard fixed intermittent wipers only have one fixed delay setting, so the driver will have to manually switch them between slow and intermittent.

To help drivers see further while navigating curves, the CX-3 has standard adaptive headlights to illuminate around corners automatically by reading vehicle speed and steering wheel angle. The CR-V doesn’t offer cornering lights.

Economic Advantages

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

Insurance will cost less for the CX-3 owner. The Car Book by Jack Gillis rates the CX-3 with a number “8” insurance rate while the CR-V is rated higher at a number “10” rate.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the CX-3 is less expensive to operate than the CR-V because typical repairs cost much less on the CX-3 than the CR-V, including $11 less for a water pump, $5 less for a muffler, $253 less for a starter, $174 less for a fuel pump, $8 less for front struts and $37 less for a power steering pump.

Recommendations

© 1999 - 2022 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America. If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. 6IUEX-0KENZ 92.204.129.161 2022/09/21

Consumer Reports® recommends both the Mazda CX-3 and the Honda CR-V, based on reliability, safety and performance.

© 1991-2021 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.
Data provided by Advanta-STAR Automotive Research.

Is Mazda CX

However, most complaints about the CX-3 have to do with the cabin and trunk area being too small. This segment is wildly popular, but it has to tow a thin line. Make it too big and, well, it's too big, but make it too small, and you might as well have bought a sedan that is better on fuel and more fun to drive.

Is Mazda CX

The Mazda CX-3 Reliability Rating is 4.5 out of 5.0, which ranks it 2nd out of 7 for subcompact SUVs. The average annual repair cost is $345 which means it has excellent ownership costs.

Which is bigger Mazda CX

Your passengers will also have more space in the Mazda CX-5 with 103.6 cubic feet of passenger volume compared to the CX-3's 87.6 cubic feet. It translates into more space for rear passengers, too — with the Mazda CX-5 offering 39.6 inches of rear legroom, compared to 35 inches in the Mazda CX-3.

Is Mazda CX

The 2021 Mazda CX-30 is slightly larger than the 2021 Mazda CX-3, making it the perfect choice if you need a bit more space for passengers and cargo. Both SUVs share a similar exterior design, but when it comes to its interior, the Mazda CX-30 takes some design cues from the Mazda3.