Bruce protocol stress test results by age

How old does your birth certificate say you are? How old do you feel? The best predictor of how long you’ll live? It’s actually a stress test’s ‘estimated age.’

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Cleveland Clinic researchers have developed a tool to calculate a person’s physiological age based on their exercise performance during a stress test. They found it’s a better predictor of how long they’ll live vs. their actual age.

What they examined

Researchers studied 126,356 patients who were referred for exercise treadmill testing at Cleveland Clinic between Jan. 1, 1991, and Feb. 27, 2015. They evaluated whether a patient’s estimated age based on their exercise performance is a better predictor of mortality than their chronological age.

The average age of study participants was 53.5 years old and 59% were male. The paper was published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

This new tool is a better predictor of lifespan

The study found that the estimated age based on exercise performance was better in predicting survival than the patients’ actual age. This held true for both men and women. Among those included, 55% of males and 57% of females between the ages of 50 and 60 years had an estimated age younger than their chronological age.

The formula to estimate physiological age was developed based on exercise variables that were collected at the time of the patient’s stress test.

Why this new research is important

The study further confirmed that all exercise variables included in estimating physiological age were powerful predictors of survival, including exercise capacity, chronotropic competence (heart rate response to exercise) and heart rate recovery.

“Physiological age based on your exercise performance on stress testing is an even better predictor on how long you will live,” says cardiologist and study’s first author Serge Harb, MD.

The key take-home message for patients is to exercise more ― and for healthcare providers to use this physiological age as a way to motivate their patients to improve their exercise performance. For the first time, we can quantify the impact of your performance level on a treadmill test in adding or subtracting years from your actual age.

According to the CDC, heart disease is the leading cause of death among women and men in the United States. Stress testing is a common diagnostic tool for cardiovascular disease.

It’s important to note that the study analyzed findings from a large population. You should always check with your healthcare provider before starting an exercise program.

VO2Max: Bruce Protocol

Quickly measure and calculate your VO2Max and cardiovascular capacity

VO2Max is a measurement of your body’s ability to process a volume of oxygen and is indexed to your body mass. Achieving and maintaining a healthy cardiovascular system is one of the most important aspects of fitness. Because it measures your body’s capacity to process oxygen, it serves as a good indicator of how much you can safely exert yourself during exercise.

Bruce Protocol

Purpose

Estimate the body’s ability to deliver and extract oxygen to determine cardiovascular fitness level.

Equipment

Treadmill

Procedure

Bruce test is considered a maximal exercise test where the athlete or client runs to complete fatigue as the treadmill speed and incline are increased every three minutes. Record total running time.

Stages

  1. Stage 1 = 1.7 mph at 10% Grade
  2. Stage 2 = 2.5 mph at 12% Grade
  3. Stage 3 = 3.4 mph at 14% Grade
  4. Stage 4 = 4.2 mph at 16% Grade
  5. Stage 5 = 5.0 mph at 18% Grade
  6. Stage 6 = 5.5 mph at 20% Grade
  7. Stage 7 = 6.0 mph at 22% Grade
  8. Stage 8 = 6.5 mph at 24% Grade
  9. Stage 9 = 7.0 mph at 26% Grade

Bruce Protocol Calculation

Calculation Result

DATE -
VO2Max (mL/kg · min) -
VO2Max Classification -

VO2Max Classification Chart

Male: 18-25 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 60 > 60.0
Excellent 52 59.9
Above Average 47 51.9
Average 42 46.9
Below Average 37 41.9
Poor 30 36.9
Very Poor 0 29.9

Male: 26-35 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 56 > 56.0
Excellent 49 55.9
Above Average 43 48.9
Average 40 42.9
Below Average 35 39.9
Poor 30 34.9
Very Poor 0 29.9

Male: 36-45 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 51 > 51.0
Excellent 43 50.9
Above Average 39 42.9
Average 35 38.9
Below Average 31 34.9
Poor 26 30.9
Very Poor 0 25.9

Male: 46-55 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 45 > 45.0
Excellent 39 44.9
Above Average 36 38.9
Average 32 35.9
Below Average 29 31.9
Poor 25 28.9
Very Poor 0 24.9

Male: 56-65 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 41 > 41.0
Excellent 36 40.9
Above Average 32 35.9
Average 30 31.9
Below Average 26 29.9
Poor 22 25.9
Very Poor 0 21.9

Male: 66-100 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 37 > 37.0
Excellent 33 36.9
Above Average 29 32.9
Average 26 28.9
Below Average 22 25.9
Poor 20 21.9
Very Poor 0 19.9

Female: 18-25 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 56 > 56.0
Excellent 47 55.9
Above Average 42 46.9
Average 38 41.9
Below Average 33 37.9
Poor 28 32.9
Very Poor 0 27.9

Female: 26-35 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 52 > 52.0
Excellent 45 51.9
Above Average 39 44.9
Average 35 38.9
Below Average 31 34.9
Poor 26 30.9
Very Poor 0 25.9

Female: 36-45 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 45 > 45.0
Excellent 38 44.9
Above Average 34 37.9
Average 31 33.9
Below Average 27 30.9
Poor 22 26.9
Very Poor 0 21.9

Female: 46-55 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 40 > 40.0
Excellent 34 39.9
Above Average 31 33.9
Average 28 30.9
Below Average 25 27.9
Poor 20 24.9
Very Poor 0 19.9

Female: 56-65 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 37 > 37.0
Excellent 32 36.9
Above Average 28 31.9
Average 25 27.9
Below Average 22 24.9
Poor 18 21.9
Very Poor 0 17.9

Female: 66-100 y/o

CLASSIFICATIONFROM (mL/(kg · min))TO (mL/(kg · min))
Superior 32 > 32.0
Excellent 28 31.9
Above Average 25 27.9
Average 22 24.9
Below Average 19 21.9
Poor 17 18.9
Very Poor 0 16.9

The Modern Platform for Personal Training Operations

What is a good score on the Bruce protocol?

A good maximum METs value for a 30-year-old woman is 14 and for a man 15. Elite athletes can reach maximum METs of up to 22 (women) and 25 (men).

What is a good METs score for a stress test by age?

A healthy 50-year-old man should have a capacity of at least 9.2 METs; a healthy 50-year-old woman should clock in at 8.2 METs or higher, according to a recent study on women's fitness in the New England Journal of Medicine. For men age 20, 13.5 METs; age 30, 11.4 METs; age 40, 10.3 METs.

What is a good score for a stress test?

Low risk (score > 5) indicates a 5-year survival of 97%. Intermediate risk (score between 4 and -11) indicates 5-year survival of 90%. High risk (score < -11) indicates 5-year survival of 65%. In high-risk patients, 74% had 3-vessel or left main occlusive coronary disease on angiography.

What is the grade at stage 4 of Bruce protocol?

Bruce Protocol Stages.